A quotient such as can't be split into separate terms, and dividing the derivatives gives the wrong answer for the same reason that multiplying them fails for products (topic 2.8). The quotient rule gives the right derivative. It follows from the product rule in a few lines of algebra, and its one awkward feature, a subtraction whose order matters, comes straight out of that derivation.
Where the rule comes from
Let , where . Multiplying both sides by turns the quotient into a product:
Assuming is differentiable (a proof straight from the limit definition shows it is, wherever and are differentiable and ), differentiate both sides with the product rule:
Solve for , then replace with :
Multiplying the top and bottom by clears the inner fraction and gives the rule.
Unlike the product rule, the order in the numerator matters, because subtraction isn't commutative: swapping the two terms changes the sign of the answer. The derivation shows which term comes first. The term with , the derivative of the top, is the one that was already there before you solved for , so it is the positive one. The sign also makes sense: if the top grows (positive ) while the bottom stays fixed, the quotient grows, so the term must be positive; if the bottom grows (positive ) while the top stays fixed, the quotient shrinks, so the term must be negative.
A quick test: for with , the rule gives , as it should.
Two consequences: reciprocals and negative powers
When the top is the constant 1, its derivative is 0 and the rule shortens to the reciprocal rule:
With for a positive integer , this proves the power rule (topic 2.5) for negative integer exponents:
That is exactly with replaced by , so the power rule's pattern holds for negative integer exponents too.
When not to use it
The quotient rule always works when its conditions hold, but it is often the long way around. Before using it, check whether the quotient can be rewritten:
| Function | Faster route | Derivative |
|---|---|---|
| constant over a power: | ||
| constant denominator: | ||
| single power below: | ||
| cancel: for | for |
In the last row, the original function is undefined at , so its derivative is undefined there too, even though is defined everywhere. Cancelling changes the formula, not the domain.
Use the quotient rule when no rewrite gets rid of the division. That happens when the denominator is a sum that doesn't divide out or a non-power function (, , ). It also happens when the denominator is a single power but the numerator is not a sum of powers (, ): rewriting as leaves a product of two functions of , which the power rule can't handle.
Worked examples
Find for .
Show solution
Name the pieces first: top with ; bottom with . Then
Expand the numerator, distributing the minus sign over the whole second product:
so
Leave the denominator squared and unexpanded. It is always positive here, so the sign of the derivative is the sign of the numerator .
Let for .
(a) Find .
(b) Find the point where the graph of has a horizontal tangent line.
(c) Write an equation for the line tangent to the graph of at .
Show solution
(a) Top with derivative ; bottom with derivative 1:
(b) when the numerator is 0, since : , so . The point is .
(c) and , so the tangent line is .
Rewriting as and using the product rule would also work; the quotient rule is just as short here.
The functions and are differentiable, with , , and .
(a) Let . Find .
(b) Let . Find .
Show solution
(a) Write the rule, then substitute:
(b) The bottom is itself a product, so first find its value and derivative at 2. Let . Then , and by the product rule , so . The top has and . Now apply the quotient rule:
Computing the four numbers , , , separately keeps the product rule and quotient rule from tangling.
A particle moves along the -axis. Its position at time is . Velocity is the derivative of position (topic 4.2 develops motion in detail).
(a) Find the velocity of the particle.
(b) For , at what time is the particle at rest?
(c) Is the particle moving to the left or to the right at ? Give a reason for your answer.
Show solution
(a) By the quotient rule, with top and bottom :
(b) The particle is at rest when . The denominator is never 0, so set the numerator to 0: gives (since ).
(c) . Since , the particle is moving to the left at .
The reason in (c) has to cite the sign of the velocity. The position is positive, but that says where the particle is, not which way it is going.
Where students lose points
On the exam
The quotient rule appears with formulas and with tables of values. On free-response parts, an unsimplified derivative is acceptable unless the question asks for something that depends on simplifying, such as where the derivative is 0. Topic 2.10 uses the quotient rule to find the derivatives of , , and .
Check yourself
Question 1
If , then
- A
- B
- C
- D
Show answer
A
. Choice B reverses the subtraction, choice C divides the derivatives , and choice D adds the two products instead of subtracting.
- A
Question 2
Find the slope of the graph of at .
Show answer
, which is at .
Question 3
A differentiable function has and . What is the derivative of at ?
Show answer
The quotient rule with top 1 gives , so the value is . It is negative because a growing denominator makes the reciprocal shrink.
Question 4
Which function's derivative can't be found by rewriting it and using only the power, constant multiple, sum and basic-function rules (topics 2.5 to 2.7), so that it needs the quotient rule?
- A
- B
- C
- D
Show answer
D
A simplifies to (for ) and B is , both handled by the power rule. C is the constant multiple , so its derivative needs only the constant multiple rule and the derivative of , even though is not a power of . In D the denominator is a sum, so it doesn't divide into the numerator term by term, and the quotient rule is required.
- A