When George Washington took the oath of office in New York on April 30, 1789, the Constitution was a plan on paper. There was no cabinet, no federal court, no tax system, and no way of dealing with the Native nations, Spanish officials and British soldiers who still held much of the land the United States claimed. Over the next twelve years, the Washington and Adams administrations built those institutions, and the arguments over how to build them split the country's leaders into the first national political parties.
Putting the Constitution into practice
The Constitution left much to be decided, so nearly everything the first officeholders did became a precedent, a model later leaders followed.
- Departments and the cabinet. In 1789 Congress created the Departments of State (Thomas Jefferson), Treasury (Alexander Hamilton) and War (Henry Knox), and an attorney general (Edmund Randolph). The Constitution says only that the president may ask department heads for written opinions; Washington began meeting with them as a group, and the cabinet became a permanent institution without ever being written into law.
- Federal courts. The Judiciary Act of 1789 set up a six-justice Supreme Court, with John Jay as chief justice, plus district and circuit courts, and gave the Supreme Court power to review state court decisions involving federal law.
- Rights. The First Congress proposed the amendments that became the Bill of Rights (Topic 3.8).
- Presidential conduct. The plain title "Mr. President" won out over grander proposals such as "His Highness." Washington enforced federal law with force when western Pennsylvanians rose against the whiskey tax in 1794, and stepped down after two terms, a limit no president broke until Franklin Roosevelt won a third term in 1940.
- Peaceful transfer. In 1797, John Adams succeeded Washington. In 1801, Adams handed power to his political opponent, Jefferson (Topic 4.2).
Hamilton, Jefferson and the first parties
The deepest disagreements began with money. In his Report on Public Credit (January 1790), Hamilton proposed that the national government pay its roughly $54 million debt in full, at face value, and also assume (take over and pay) about $25 million in war debts owed by the states, a policy called assumption. Paying in full would establish the country's credit, so it could borrow again in a crisis, and tying wealthy creditors to the national government would give them a stake in its success. Madison objected that many original holders, such as soldiers paid in IOUs, had sold their certificates for a fraction of their value to speculators who would now profit. Southern states, which had paid down much of their own debt, also objected to paying for states such as Massachusetts that had not. The deadlock broke in the Compromise of 1790: southern votes for assumption in exchange for a permanent national capital on the Potomac River.
Hamilton next proposed a Bank of the United States, chartered for 20 years with $10 million in capital, one-fifth owned by the government. It would hold federal money, lend to the government, and issue a stable paper currency. The Constitution does not mention a bank, so the argument turned on how to read it. Jefferson took a strict construction: under the necessary and proper clause, Congress could do only what was truly necessary to carry out its listed powers, and a bank was merely convenient. Hamilton argued a loose construction: the clause allowed any reasonable means to a constitutional end, such as collecting taxes and borrowing, unless the Constitution forbade it. Washington signed the bank bill in February 1791. Hamilton's Report on Manufactures (December 1791) proposed tariffs and subsidies to build American industry; Congress passed little of it, though moderate tariffs became the government's main income.
The bank fight showed two visions of the republic.
| Federalists (Hamilton, Adams) | Democratic-Republicans (Jefferson, Madison) | |
|---|---|---|
| Economy | Commerce, manufacturing, banks, a funded national debt | A republic of independent farmers; suspicion of banks and speculators |
| Federal power | Strong, with loose construction | Limited, with strict construction and stronger states |
| Who should govern | The educated and propertied | Broader trust in ordinary (white male) voters |
| Foreign policy | Friendlier to Britain, the main trading partner | Friendlier to France, the 1778 ally and a fellow republic |
| Base | New England, merchants, creditors | The South and West, farmers, and later urban artisans |
Neither man meant to found a party; most leaders still thought organized parties were dangerous factions. But by 1792 each side had its own newspaper (John Fenno's Gazette of the United States for Hamilton, Philip Freneau's National Gazette for Jefferson), and Jefferson left the cabinet at the end of 1793. Foreign policy turned this split into two organized parties.
The French Revolution divides the country
When France declared war on Britain in February 1793, the United States faced a hard choice. The 1778 Treaty of Alliance tied it to France, but Britain was the country's main trading partner, and duties on imports, most of them British goods, supplied nearly all federal revenue, the money that paid the interest on Hamilton's funded debt. Washington issued a Proclamation of Neutrality in April 1793, a precedent that the president can set foreign policy. The new French minister, Edmond Genet, toured the country cheered by crowds and commissioned American ships as privateers (privately owned armed ships licensed by a government to capture an enemy's merchant ships) to attack British vessels, defying the proclamation, until Washington demanded his recall. Pro-French Democratic-Republican Societies formed in dozens of towns to criticize the administration, and after the Whiskey Rebellion Washington blamed "self-created societies" for stirring it up.
Neutrality did not protect American shipping. In 1793 and 1794 Britain seized hundreds of American ships trading with the French West Indies and impressed (forcibly drafted) American sailors into the Royal Navy. To avoid war, Washington sent Chief Justice John Jay to London. Jay's Treaty (1794) got Britain to withdraw from its forts in the Northwest by 1796 and to send American claims for seized ships to a commission. It said nothing about impressment or neutral rights, and its opening of the British West Indies to small American ships came with such tight limits that the Senate struck that article out. Democratic-Republicans burned Jay in effigy, and the Senate ratified the treaty in 1795 by exactly the two-thirds needed, 20 to 10. The fight over Jay's Treaty, more than any other issue, created organized parties that ran candidates against each other in the election of 1796, which Adams won by three electoral votes, with Jefferson becoming vice president.
France treated Jay's Treaty as an alliance with its enemy and began seizing American ships. When Adams sent diplomats to Paris in 1797, three agents of Foreign Minister Talleyrand, identified in the published dispatches as X, Y and Z, demanded a bribe of about $250,000 and a large loan before talks could begin. The XYZ Affair made Federalists briefly popular, and from 1798 to 1800 the two countries fought an undeclared naval war, the Quasi-War, while Congress created the Navy Department.
Federalists used the crisis against their opponents. The Alien and Sedition Acts (1798) raised the residency requirement for citizenship from five to fourteen years (most immigrants voted Democratic-Republican), let the president deport foreigners he judged dangerous, and made it a crime to publish "false, scandalous and malicious" writing against the government. Some 25 people, mostly Democratic-Republican editors, were charged; Vermont congressman Matthew Lyon was jailed and won reelection from his cell. Jefferson and Madison answered with the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions (1798), written in secret, which argued that the Constitution was a compact among the states and that states could judge when Congress exceeded its powers; Kentucky's 1799 resolution used the word "nullification." No other state agreed, but the argument would return in the nullification crisis of 1832. Adams, against Hamilton's wishes, sent new envoys to France, and the Convention of 1800 ended both the Quasi-War and the 1778 alliance.
Here was the 1790s' central conflict over liberty and order: Federalists believed criticism in wartime threatened the government itself, while Democratic-Republicans believed punishing it destroyed the free press the First Amendment protected.
The West: Britain, Spain and Native nations
Settlers poured over the Appalachians after the war. Kentucky became a state in 1792 and Tennessee in 1796. Their problems were foreign ones. British troops still held forts around the Great Lakes and supplied Native nations resisting American expansion. Spain controlled New Orleans and closed the Mississippi to Americans, and its agents tempted westerners to break from the Union. The Washington administration handled both through diplomacy. Jay's Treaty got the British out of the forts. Pinckney's Treaty (the Treaty of San Lorenzo, 1795) got Spain to grant free navigation of the Mississippi, the right of deposit (to store goods at New Orleans for export without paying duties), and a southern boundary at the 31st parallel. The Senate ratified it unanimously; westerners got everything they wanted.
Relations with American Indians rested on an ambiguous legal footing. The Constitution lists the "Indian Tribes" next to foreign nations as partners in commerce, and the federal government made treaties with them, as it did with foreign states. Yet the United States claimed sovereignty over their land under the Treaty of Paris, which Native nations had not signed. The Trade and Intercourse Act of 1790 said that only the federal government could buy Indian land, by treaty. But states such as Georgia and New York made their own deals, and settlers squatted on land no treaty had touched. Secretary of War Knox hoped to buy land peacefully and "civilize" Native peoples into farmers, while the government kept pushing them to sell.
North of the Ohio, a Western Confederacy of Shawnee, Miami, Delaware and other nations, led by Little Turtle and Blue Jacket, defeated an American army under Josiah Harmar in 1790 and destroyed Arthur St. Clair's army in November 1791, killing more than 600 soldiers, the worst defeat a U.S. army ever suffered against Native forces. General Anthony Wayne rebuilt the army and won the Battle of Fallen Timbers in August 1794; the British at nearby Fort Miamis closed their gates to the retreating warriors. In the Treaty of Greenville (1795), the confederacy gave up most of present-day Ohio for goods and yearly payments. Each treaty treated Native nations as sovereigns able to sell land, and each was made under military pressure, so their status, independent nations or dependents of the United States, stayed unsettled until the Cherokee cases of the 1830s.
Spanish California
While Americans pushed west, Spain pushed north along the Pacific. Worried that Russian fur traders moving down from Alaska and British ships would claim the coast, Spain sent soldiers under Gaspar de Portolá and Franciscan missionaries under Junípero Serra to San Diego in 1769. Over the next half century they built 21 missions from San Diego to Sonoma, along with presidios (forts) and towns such as San José (1777) and Los Angeles (1781).
The missions ran on Native labor. Once baptized, Native people were not allowed to leave, and they farmed, herded and built under the friars' control, with whipping as punishment and soldiers to capture those who fled. Disease and harsh conditions caused deaths to outnumber births in the missions, and Native peoples resisted: the Kumeyaay burned the San Diego mission in 1775, and in 1785 a woman named Toypurina helped plan a revolt at San Gabriel.
For the settlers, the frontier offered social mobility. Most soldiers and settlers were of mixed Spanish, Indigenous and African ancestry, which placed them low in New Spain's sistema de castas, a colonial ranking of people by ancestry with Spaniards at the top and people of Indigenous and African descent below them. In California they could gain land, become respected gente de razón ("people of reason," a label for Hispanicized colonists), and see their caste labels change on official records. The result was cultural blending: Catholic and Native religious practices merged, Spanish livestock and crops changed Native life, and new mixed communities formed.
Washington's Farewell Address
In September 1796, Washington announced that he would not seek a third term in a letter printed in newspapers, drafted with help from Hamilton. Written amid the Jay Treaty fight and French efforts to sway the coming election, it urged Americans to value the Union above section or party. Washington warned against parties built on "geographical discriminations, Northern and Southern, Atlantic and Western," and against "the spirit of party" in general, which he feared could lead to the "permanent despotism" of a faction's leader. On foreign policy, he advised trade with all nations but as few political ties as possible, and to "steer clear of permanent alliances," though he accepted temporary alliances in emergencies.
The address served as a guide to American foreign policy for more than a century, and later leaders cited it when they avoided European alliances. But it was not neutral. By 1796 Washington stood with the Federalists, and Democratic-Republicans read his attack on party, and his warning against foreign attachments, as aimed at them and their sympathy for France.
Worked examples
Describe the historical situation, the intended audience, the purpose, and the point of view of this source.
The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop. . . . It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world; so far, I mean, as we are now at liberty to do it . . .
George Washington, Farewell Address, published in newspapers, September 1796
Show solution
Historical situation. Britain and France had been at war since 1793. The United States had stayed neutral, but Jay's Treaty (1794, ratified 1795) had angered France, which was seizing American ships and trying to influence the 1796 election. The 1778 alliance with France was still in force.
Audience. The American public, through newspapers. The address was never delivered as a speech, so Washington was speaking to voters in every state, and also to the parties and foreign governments that would read it.
Purpose. To guide policy after he left office: keep trading with everyone while avoiding entanglement in Europe's wars, and honor existing treaties ("Here let us stop") without making new permanent ones.
Point of view. Washington wrote as a departing president who had spent his second term defending neutrality against pro-French critics, with help from Hamilton, the Federalist leader. That is why the warning against foreign ties reads, to Democratic-Republicans, as a rebuke of their attachment to France.
Why this works. Each element names something specific about this source. "The audience was the American people" is too thin; adding that the address was printed, not spoken, and reached foreign readers too shows you understand how the source worked.
That if any person shall write, print, utter or publish . . . any false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States, or either house of the Congress of the United States, or the President of the United States, with intent to defame the said government, or either house of the said Congress, or the said President, or to bring them, or either of them, into contempt or disrepute . . . such person . . . shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars, and by imprisonment not exceeding two years.
An Act for the Punishment of Certain Crimes against the United States (Sedition Act), Section 2, July 14, 1798
a. Briefly describe ONE historical development that led Congress to pass the act.
b. Briefly explain ONE way opponents of the Federalists responded to the act in the period 1798 to 1801.
c. Briefly explain how the act reflects a disagreement over the balance between liberty and order in the 1790s.
Show solution
a. The XYZ Affair (1797 to 1798) and the undeclared naval Quasi-War with France made Federalists fear that pro-French Democratic-Republican newspapers were undermining the government in wartime, so the Federalist Congress passed the act to silence them.
b. Jefferson and Madison secretly drafted the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions (1798), which argued that the act was unconstitutional and that states could judge when Congress overstepped its delegated powers. Democratic-Republicans also made the acts an issue in the election of 1800, which Jefferson won.
c. Federalists argued that order required punishing false and malicious attacks that could turn people against the government during a crisis. Democratic-Republicans argued that liberty depended on a free press, since the act protected the president and Congress (both Federalist) but not the vice president, Jefferson, so it worked to punish one party's criticism of the other.
Why these earn the points. Each part names a specific development (the XYZ Affair, the resolutions) and connects it to the act. Part (c) explains both sides of the disagreement and uses a detail from the act itself, the list of officials it protected, as evidence.
Evaluate the relative importance of the causes of the formation of political parties in the United States in the period 1789 to 1800.
Write a thesis, a sentence of context, and the reasoning and evidence for the body.
Show solution
Context: The framers expected government without parties; Washington's first cabinet included both Hamilton and Jefferson, and most leaders called organized parties dangerous factions.
Thesis: Disagreement over Hamilton's economic program first divided the nation's leaders, but foreign policy during the war between Britain and France was the more important cause, because it turned a quarrel among officeholders into two parties that organized voters across the country.
Body 1, economic policy (the first division). Assumption of state debts and the Bank of the United States split Hamilton from Madison and Jefferson over speculators, sectional burdens, and strict against loose construction of the necessary and proper clause. Rival newspapers appeared by 1792. Reasoning: this created the two camps and their constitutional arguments, but mostly inside Congress and the cabinet.
Body 2, foreign policy (the decisive cause). Neutrality in 1793, Genet's tour, and the Democratic-Republican Societies brought ordinary citizens into the conflict. The fight over Jay's Treaty in 1795 and 1796 produced organized campaigns, and the 1796 election was the first contest between the parties. Reasoning: foreign affairs gave each side a popular cause, Britain or France, that mobilized voters.
Body 3, liberty and order (hardening). The XYZ Affair and the Quasi-War led Federalists to pass the Alien and Sedition Acts, which Democratic-Republicans answered with the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions. Reasoning: by 1798 the parties disagreed about the limits of federal power itself, which set up the election of 1800.
Why it scores. "Relative importance" requires ranking causes, and the thesis does: economics started the split, foreign policy made it a party system. Each paragraph ties specific evidence to that ranking, and the last paragraph shows how the causes built on each other, which demonstrates complex understanding.
Where students lose points
On the exam
The skill for this topic is sourcing: identifying a document's historical situation, audience, purpose and point of view. Typical sources are the Farewell Address, the Neutrality Proclamation, letters about Genet or Jay's Treaty, the Alien and Sedition Acts, the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, and treaties with Native nations. In essays about the early republic, the 1790s give strong evidence for prompts on federal power, the origins of parties, and how foreign wars shaped domestic politics.
Check yourself
Question 1
Which of the following best explains why Jay's Treaty (1794) did more than any other issue to turn the political divisions of the early 1790s into organized parties?
- A
It required the United States to join Britain's war against France.
- B
It settled disputes with Britain on terms that Democratic-Republicans saw as surrender to Britain and betrayal of France, while Federalists defended it as the price of peace.
- C
It closed the Mississippi River to western farmers.
- D
It was rejected by the Senate, which forced Washington to call new elections.
Show answer
B
The treaty avoided war and removed the British forts, but it ignored impressment and neutral rights, so the fight over it lined up pro-British Federalists against pro-French Democratic-Republicans in Congress, the press and the 1796 election. It did not commit the United States to war, and the Senate ratified it 20 to 10.
- A
Question 2
Explain how Hamilton and Jefferson each used the necessary and proper clause in the 1791 debate over the Bank of the United States.
Show answer
Jefferson read the clause strictly: Congress could pass only laws truly necessary to carry out its listed powers, and a bank was merely convenient, so it was unconstitutional. Hamilton read it loosely: a bank was a reasonable means of carrying out the powers to tax, borrow and manage the government's money, and nothing in the Constitution forbade it.
The same clause supported opposite conclusions depending on how 'necessary' was read. Washington accepted Hamilton's reading and signed the bill, and the strict-versus-loose split became a lasting divide between the parties.
Question 3
The Treaty of Greenville (1795) and the Trade and Intercourse Act (1790) together best illustrate which feature of federal policy toward American Indians?
- A
The federal government left all dealings with Native nations to the states.
- B
Native nations were granted U.S. citizenship in exchange for land.
- C
The federal government treated Native nations as sovereigns that could sell land by treaty, while claiming authority over them and acquiring land under military pressure.
- D
The federal government recognized permanent Native ownership of all land west of the Appalachians.
Show answer
C
The 1790 act made treaties with the federal government the only lawful way to buy Indian land, which treated Native nations like foreign states, but Greenville followed Wayne's victory at Fallen Timbers. That mix of sovereignty and subordination is the ambiguity that later produced the Cherokee cases. Choice A is the opposite of the 1790 act.
- A
Question 4
Explain why Spain's mission settlements in California offered social mobility to some colonists while depending on coerced Native labor.
Show answer
Soldiers and settlers, mostly of mixed ancestry and low status in New Spain's caste system, could gain land and be recognized as respected gente de razón on the distant frontier. The missions' farms and herds that sustained them were worked by baptized Native people who were not allowed to leave and were punished if they fled.
Distance from central authority and the need for settlers loosened caste lines for colonists, while the friars' control of Native converts supplied the labor. Both sides of the system appear in the same institutions.