Unit 2: Differentiation: Definition and Fundamental Properties
Applying the Power Rule
Differentiate any power of x, including roots and reciprocals rewritten as powers, using a rule you can derive from the limit definition.
Topic 2.5 · 7 min read
Run the limit definition on x2 and the answer is 2x; run it on x3 and the answer is 3x2. (Topic 2.2's balloon, V=34πr3, came out to drdV=4πr2, which is 34π times 3r2.) Each time, the exponent comes down in front and the new exponent is one less. That pattern is the power rule, and it replaces the limit computation for every function of the form xr.
Why it works for whole-number exponents
Take a positive integer n and use the form of the definition in which x approaches a fixed point a (topic 2.1):
f′(a)=x→alimx−axn−an.
The numerator always has x−a as a factor. Multiplying out shows that
xn−an=(x−a)(xn−1+xn−2a+xn−3a2+⋯+xan−2+an−1),
because in the product every middle term cancels with a neighbor, leaving only xn and −an. (For n=2 this is x2−a2=(x−a)(x+a), and for n=3 it is x3−a3=(x−a)(x2+xa+a2).) Cancel the factor x−a, which is allowed since x=a inside the limit:
f′(a)=x→alim(xn−1+xn−2a+⋯+an−1).
The bracket has n terms, and as x→a each one becomes an−1. So the limit is nan−1. Since a was any number, dxd[xn]=nxn−1.
The small cases make sense on their own. A constant function f(x)=c has a horizontal graph, so its slope is 0 everywhere; the difference quotient is hc−c=0 for every h. The function f(x)=x is a line of slope 1, and the rule gives 1⋅x0=1.
Every other exponent
The rule holds for negative, fractional and irrational exponents too. Two cases can be checked against the definition right now:
x1=x−1. The rule predicts −1⋅x−2=−x21. From the definition, for x=0, combining the fractions gives h1(x+h1−x1)=h1⋅x(x+h)x−(x+h)=x(x+h)−1, which tends to −x21 as h→0.
x=x1/2. The rule predicts 21x−1/2=2x1. From the definition, for x>0, multiplying by the conjugate gives hx+h−x=h(x+h+x)(x+h)−x=x+h+x1, which tends to 2x1 as h→0. At x=9 this is 61, the value topic 2.1 found.
A proof for every real exponent uses tools from Unit 3, but the rule itself is stated for all r and used that way from now on.
Rewrite first, then differentiate
The power rule only applies to a single power of x, so roots, reciprocals and products of powers must be rewritten as xr first. These identities do all the work:
Form
Rewritten
nxm
xm/n
xn1
x−n
xp⋅xq
xp+q
xqxp
xp−q
After differentiating, rewriting the answer back with roots and positive exponents is optional on the exam; −21x−3/2 and −2xx1 are both correct.
Where the rule's answer is undefined
The derivative formula rxr−1 can be undefined at a point where xr itself is fine, and when it is, the function has no derivative there. For x1/3, the rule gives 31x−2/3=33x21, which is undefined at x=0: that is the vertical tangent of topic 2.4. For x2/3, the rule gives 32x−1/3, undefined at 0: the cusp. For x, the derivative 2x1 exists only for x>0, so x is not differentiable at the endpoint 0 of its domain.
What the power rule does not cover
The rule needs the variable in the base and a constant in the exponent. It does not apply to:
Exponential functions, with the variable in the exponent: 2x and ex are not powers of x. Topic 2.7 handles ex.
Constants that look like powers: π3 and 52 are numbers, so their derivatives are 0.
Powers of other expressions: (2x+1)3 is a power of 2x+1, and its derivative needs the chain rule (topic 3.1), which supplies a factor the power rule alone would miss.
Coefficients and sums, as in 4x3−7x, are handled term by term with the rules of topic 2.6.
Worked examples
Worked exampleExample 1: rewriting and differentiating
(d) xx=x1⋅x1/2=x3/2. One power, so no product rule is needed:
dxd[x3/2]=23x1/2=23x.
(e) π3 is a constant (about 31.006), so its derivative is 0.
The step that decides each answer is the subtraction r−1. With a negative or fractional exponent, write it out rather than doing it in your head.
Worked exampleExample 2: a family of tangent lines
Let f(x)=x21.
(a) Write an equation for the line tangent to the graph of f at x=1, and find where it crosses the x-axis.
(b) Show that for every a>0, the line tangent to the graph of f at x=a crosses the x-axis at x=23a.
Show solution
Rewrite f(x)=x−2, so f′(x)=−2x−3=−x32.
(a) f(1)=1 and f′(1)=−2, so the tangent line is y=1−2(x−1). Setting y=0 gives x−1=21, so it crosses at x=23.
(b) At x=a, the point is (a,a21) and the slope is −a32:
y=a21−a32(x−a).
Setting y=0 and multiplying both sides by a3 gives 0=a−2(x−a), so x−a=2a and x=23a.
Part (a) is the case a=1. The general version is only possible because the power rule gives f′ at every point at once; with the limit definition you would redo the limit for each a.
Worked exampleExample 3: limits and exponents (exam level, no calculator)
(a) What is h→0limh38+h−2?
(A) 0 (B) 121 (C) 31 (D) The limit does not exist.
(b) Let g(x)=x4/3 and k(x)=x1/3. Is g differentiable at x=0? Is k? Justify your answers.
Show solution
(a) Since 38=2, the limit has the form hf(8+h)−f(8) for f(x)=x1/3, so it equals f′(8) (topic 2.1). By the power rule, f′(x)=31x−2/3, and 8−2/3=82/31=41, so
f′(8)=31⋅41=121.
The answer is (B). Choice (C) stops at the coefficient 31 and forgets to evaluate x−2/3 at 8; choice (D) comes from seeing 00 and stopping.
(b) For g, the power rule gives g′(x)=34x1/3, which is defined at 0: g′(0)=0. To confirm directly, the difference quotient at 0 is hh4/3−0=h1/3, which tends to 0 as h→0. So g is differentiable at x=0, with a horizontal tangent there.
For k, the difference quotient at 0 is hh1/3=h2/31, which grows without bound as h→0. So k is not differentiable at x=0; its graph has a vertical tangent there. The power rule's formula 31x−2/3 agrees: it is undefined at 0.
The exponent decides the outcome. With r>1, the new exponent r−1 is positive and xr−1 is 0 at x=0; with 0<r<1, the new exponent is negative and xr−1 blows up there.
Where students lose points
On the exam
Questions that test the power rule directly present a root or reciprocal that must be rewritten first, or a limit in the shape of the derivative definition whose value the power rule gives at once, as in Example 3(a). On free-response work, an unsimplified derivative such as −21x−3/2 is fully acceptable.
Check yourself
Question 1
dxd[x23x1]=
A
−37x−10/3
B
−37x−4/3
C
−35x−8/3
D
2x⋅31x−2/31
Show answer
A
The function is x−2⋅x−1/3=x−7/3, and −37−1=−310. Choice B adds 1 to the exponent instead of subtracting it, choice C combines the exponents as −2+31, and choice D differentiates the pieces of the denominator and leaves the fraction in place.
Question 2
What is the slope of the graph of y=x4 at x=−21?
Show answer
−21
dxdy=4x3, and 4(−21)3=4(−81)=−21. The cube keeps the negative sign, so the graph is falling there, as it is everywhere to the left of x=0.
Question 3
Find f′(x) for f(x)=xπ and g′(x) for g(x)=ππ.
Show answer
f′(x)=πxπ−1 and g′(x)=0.
In xπ the base is the variable and the exponent is a constant, so the power rule applies with r=π. ππ contains no variable at all; it is a number (about 36.462), so its derivative is 0.
Question 4
If f(x)=4x3, what is f′(16)?
A
21
B
23
C
83
D
6
Show answer
C
f(x)=x3/4, so f′(x)=43x−1/4, and 16−1/4=21, giving f′(16)=43⋅21=83. Choice D keeps the old exponent (43⋅163/4=6), choice B drops the negative sign (43⋅161/4=23), and choice A forgets the coefficient 43.