The function has an inverse , but you cannot easily write a formula for it: finding means solving . Yet you can find the slope of at in one line. Since , the inverse sends 2 back to 1, and since , the slope of at 2 is . This works whenever the slope of at the matching input is not 0, and the reason is the chain rule from topic 3.1 applied to the equation that defines an inverse.
What an inverse undoes
If sends to , its inverse sends back to :
For that to make sense, must be one-to-one: no two inputs share an output, so each comes from a single . A function whose derivative is positive everywhere on an interval is increasing there, so it never repeats an output and has an inverse on that interval. The same is true when the derivative is negative everywhere. Topic 5.3 proves the link between the sign of and increasing or decreasing.
Two facts follow directly from the definition.
- Undoing. for every in the domain of , and for every in the domain of .
- Swapped points. The point is on the graph of exactly when is on the graph of . Swapping coordinates is reflection across the line , so the two graphs are mirror images in that line.
The notation means the inverse function, not the reciprocal . The two are unrelated: for , the inverse is , while the reciprocal is .
Why the slopes are reciprocals
Reflecting across swaps horizontal and vertical. A segment that rises 4 units over a run of 1 becomes, after reflection, a segment that rises 1 over a run of 4. So if the tangent to at has slope , the reflected tangent, which touches at , has slope .
The chain rule turns that picture into a proof. Write and start from the undoing equation,
Differentiate both sides. The left side is a composition with outside and inside , so by the chain rule
Dividing is allowed only when . The same result comes from implicit differentiation (topic 3.2): means , and differentiating with respect to gives . In Leibniz notation, with , this reads : the rate of the inverse is the reciprocal of the original rate, measured at the same point of the curve.
The step that takes thought is finding . You are given , an output of , and you need the input that produced it, so you solve . With a formula, try small integers first, as with in the opening; on a calculator question, use the calculator's solver. With a table, look for in the column, not the column. With a graph, find the point of the graph whose height is . For instance, if the graph of passes through with a tangent slope of 3 there, then the graph of passes through with slope .
When the inverse has no derivative
If , the formula would divide by zero, and the inverse really does fail to have a derivative at . The picture explains it: the tangent to at is horizontal, and reflecting a horizontal line across gives a vertical one. So the graph of has a vertical tangent at .
The simplest case is , which is one-to-one with inverse . Since , the cube root has a vertical tangent at the origin. Directly, , which grows without bound as .
The chain-rule derivation assumed exists and then found its value. Slopes of secant lines show why it exists when . Take a point near and let , so . The secant slope of between and is
the reciprocal of a secant slope of between and . The graph of is the unbroken graph of reflected across , so as , , and the bottom fraction approaches . When , the whole expression approaches , so exists and has that value. When , the secant slopes of grow without bound in size, which is the vertical tangent. So whenever you use the formula, the nonzero denominator is the condition that makes the answer valid.
Derivatives you already use, explained
Two derivatives from Unit 2 come straight from this rule.
The natural log. is the inverse of , and . With ,
The denominator is never 0, which is why is differentiable on its entire domain, .
The square root. On , is the inverse of , and . So
which matches the power rule with exponent . At the denominator is , and the square root has a vertical tangent there.
The same method gives the derivatives of , and the other inverse trigonometric functions, which topic 3.4 covers.
Worked examples
Let , and let be the inverse of . Explain why exists, and write an equation for the line tangent to the graph of at .
Show solution
Why the inverse exists. for every , so is increasing on all real numbers and never takes the same value twice.
The point. The tangent line to at needs , the input of that gives 2. Solve by trying small integers: . So , and the point is .
The slope. , which is not 0, so
The line.
As a check, reflect the tangent line to at , which is . Swapping and gives , and solving for gives the same line.
The function is differentiable and increasing for all real numbers, and is the inverse of . The table gives values of and .
(a) Find .
(b) Find .
(c) Let . Find .
(d) Write an equation for the line tangent to the graph of at .
Show solution
Every part starts the same way: find the given number in the row, then read the above it. That is the value of .
(a) , so :
(b) , so :
(c) is a product, so . Since , and . Then
(d) , so and . The tangent line is
Notice that is large exactly where is small. Where is nearly flat, the reflected graph is nearly vertical.
Let .
(a) Explain why has an inverse function defined for all real numbers.
(b) Find and .
(c) Find . Give your answer to three decimal places.
(d) Show that for every real number , and use this to check your answers to (b) and (c).
Show solution
(a) . Since , for all , so is increasing and therefore one-to-one. Also , so takes arbitrarily large positive and negative values, and being continuous it takes every value in between. So is defined for all real numbers.
(b) Look for an input with : . So , and since ,
(c) The equation cannot be solved by algebra, so use the calculator's solver: . Store the full value rather than retyping the rounded one. Then
(d) For every , . Because , the denominator is between 1 and 3, so
Both earlier answers fit: and are between and 1. The value in (c) is close to the upper bound because is close to , where is nearly 1 and is at its flattest. A bound catches some slips but not all. Using instead of would give , which is also in range, so confirm the matching point too: .
Where students lose points
On the exam
Inverse-derivative questions give by a formula, a table, or a graph and ask for or a tangent line to . They appear in multiple choice and as parts of free-response questions, with or without a calculator. The work a grader looks for is the matching point, written as or , then the reciprocal of . If finding from needs a solver, the question will be calculator-active, and the answer is expected to three decimal places.
Check yourself
Question 1
Let , and let be the inverse of . What is ?
- A
- B
- C
- D
Show answer
A
Solving gives , since . Then . Choice B is , the slope of at the wrong point; choice D is the derivative of at , which confuses the inverse with the reciprocal.
- A
Question 2
The function is differentiable and one-to-one, with and . Let be the inverse of . Find , and say what its sign tells you about .
Show answer
; is decreasing at .
Since , , and . Reflecting across never changes the sign of a slope, so the inverse of a decreasing function is decreasing.
Question 3
Let , which is one-to-one, and let be its inverse. Which statement about at is true?
- A
- B
- C
is not differentiable at ; its graph has a vertical tangent there.
- D
is not defined at .
Show answer
C
, so , and gives . The tangent to at is horizontal, so its reflection, the tangent to at , is vertical. Choice A copies the slope of instead of taking its reciprocal; choice D fails because exists.
- A
Question 4
The line tangent to the graph of a one-to-one differentiable function at is . Let be the inverse of . Write an equation for the line tangent to the graph of at .
Show answer
The tangent line touches at , so and . Then and . Equivalently, swapping and in reflects the whole tangent line across .